It can be administered to them if they are sitting or standing as long as they are erect. Then, the officer is going to look for is equal tracking. Before the instructional phase, the officer must medically clear the individual. 2020 Feb;33(1):142-149. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000776. The three tests are Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (the eye test), Walk and Turn, and One Leg Stand. About half of the officers are ARIDE trained. even though its not your fault. You may also stop taking the tests at any time. There is a maximum of six possible clues, with three in each eye. Legal Disclaimer, CUSTOMIZATION BY JOLLY GOOD MEDIA WEB DESIGN. If the suspect has any of those medical conditions, then that would likely result in their performing the test poorly. Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees what are the 3 phases of DWI? Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Field Sobriety Test Administration It is important to note that the officer must move the stimulus slowly when performing this part of the HGN test so that it moves from the center to the point just before 45 degrees in no less than four seconds. The officer is supposed to ask anyone wearing that type of footwear if they would like to remove their footwear. Officers will look for whether the driver: A driver is instructed to stand with their arms down by their side and with one foot approximately six inches off the ground and to count aloud (one thousand one, one thousand two, etc.) Please remove your glasses. Thats it. When checking for distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation, the eye is held out for a minimum of _____ seconds. This depends on the proper administration, proper scoring, and proper training is adhered to. In three the diagnosis remained uncertain. Its commonly known as the HGN test, or in the DUI world, the eye test. This optokinetic Nystagmus is a defense mechanism of the body in order to keep the eyes from tiring. Verbal Instructions. Look for these clues in each eye: Lack of smooth pursuit Distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees +6 5 15-4 Clue No. Dont The jerking must be both distinct and sustained. Teen driver gets 9 months for death of newlywed, Judge OKs red-light cameras for Clarksville, Parent victims want defense accountability, This week in the Court of Criminal Appeals, Distinct and Sustained Nystagmus at Maximum Deviation, Pre Tests for Horizontal Gaze nystagmus explained. We enrolled consecutive consenting patients arriving at a single emergency department with acute vertigo. https://www.peachstatelawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/w-scott-smith-logo.png. If you are heavily intoxicated and you know that you are heavily intoxicated, then it may not be to your benefit to perform these tests. you are driving while intoxicated, regardless of whether external factors Taking the tests is a judgement call. Oklahoma city criminal defense attorney Frank Urbanic provides efficient, effective, and relentless representation. This is the most difficult to evaluate. There is a maximum of six possible clues, with three in each eye. This is accomplished by simply moving the object to the side until the eye has gone as far to the side as possible. If you've had too much to drink, you may experience impairment accompanied by HGN. The officer is looking for 3 possible indicators in each eye: lack of smooth pursuit, distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation (extreme periphery), and onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees. Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety, National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Epub 2021 Aug 16. van Kordelaar J, Pasma JH, Cenciarini M, Schouten AC, van der Kooij H, Maurer C. Front Neurol. 4, Driver Education, March 2009, Highway Safety Program Guideline No. Even if you don't have this condition but other factors besides alcohol and drugs affected your nystagmus, you may face this serious accusation even . This non-standard field sobriety test that is most often used to detect whether an individual is under the influence of drugs or a controlled substance. The 3 clues for the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test are. If you look bad on the video, then that video will have to be overcome somehow. MRI was obtained within 24 hours. Youre about to perform the horizontal gaze nystagmus field sobriety test. - Cannot maintain balance during instruction. If a suspect exhibits this clue in one eye, the probability increases that all the other clues will be seen as well. may interfere with the performance of the Nystagmus test. The clues are established in pairs. National Library of Medicine If a suspect exhibits only lack of smooth pursuit, then they have a 0.04 blood alcohol content. Copyright 2020 Peachstate Lawyer Atlanta, Georgia / W.Scott Smith / All Rights Reserved. This will be a very smooth pursuit. Cannot keep balance 2. Your browser is out of date. Once the officer sees nystagmus, they must stop and hold the stimulus there to confirm that the eye is indeed jerking. Disclaimer. this process, they will move the object horizontally and monitor your Distinct and Sustained Nystagmus at Maximum Deviation Onset of Nystagmus Prior to 45 degrees Anatomy & Physiology Retina is the photosensitive layer of the eye Fovea is the area of sharp central vision Optic nerve carries information out of the eye to the brain Observation for spontaneous nystagmus, its response to visual fixation, and testing the vestibulo-ocular reflex with the horizontal head impulse test were the chief examination components. Stops while walking 4. Although this may be the case, this angle should not be used to estimate a specific amount of alcohol in the bloodstream. results, and frankly, they may not care. There are two in the instructional phase and six in the walking phase. Ultimately, the officer must have probable cause to arrest somebody. If somebody raises their arms to brush their hair out of their face or to scratch something, then that does not constitute raising arms for balance. reach out to us at (817) 435-4970 for a free consultation to learn how our DWI attorney Some ARIDE-trained officers think theyre Drug Recognition Experts (DREs). However, officers very frequently administer the tests improperly. We aimed to assess the contribution of spontaneous nystagmus in the diagnosis of acute vertigo. Nystagmus is the involuntary jerking of the eyes. The most recent studies show a high percentage of correct evaluations by the officer when the tests are administered correctly. The officer is also trained to administer this test with the suspect looking into a quiet background, away from the police cruisers overhead lights. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. There are no points associated with vertical nystagmus; it is just to determine if there is any intoxication beyond the level detected by the first three HGN tests. It is a rhythmic, involuntary, rapid, oscillatory movement of the eyes. eye movement. Then, they may instruct you to follow 3, Motorcycle Safety, November 2006, Highway Safety Program Guideline No. A 0.08 BAC is associated with distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation, and a 0.10 blood alcohol content is associated with onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees. 12, Prosecutor Training, March 2009, Highway Safety Program Guideline No. Remember the jerkiness must be distinct and obvious to be scored a point. At the end of all of the instructions, the officer must ask the suspect again if they understand. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. 2020 Feb 24;192(8):E182-E186. 16, Management of Highway Incidents, DOT HS 812 007E, April 2014, Highway Safety Program Guideline No. There are numerous visual or other distractions that may impede this test. The results of a PBT are not admissible in Court but only serve to guide the officer in deciding whether an arrest should be made. For example, the Walk and Turn has to be done on a relatively smooth and level area. Even this test is not 100% as three or four subjects during State Police controlled drinking exercises have scored zero points on this test, yet had a BAC above a .10% and showed little or no other signs of intoxication. Washington, DC20590 Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees in left eye. hesitate to Instagram, Information can be found atNHTSA.gov/coronavirus, Adapting Motor Vehicles for People With Disabilities, DOT HS 810 733, June 2015, Highway Safety Programs; Model Specifications for Devices to Measure Breath Alcohol, 58 FR 48705, September 17, 1993, Highway Safety Programs; Model Specifications for Screening; Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids, 73 FR 16956, March 31, 2008, Highway Safety Programs; Model Specifications for Calibrating Units for Breath Alcohol Testers; Conforming Products List of Calibrating Units for Breath Alcohol Testers, 72 FR 34742, June 15, 2007, Highway Safety Programs; Conforming Products List of Evidential Breath Alcohol Measurement Devices, 82 FR 50940, November 2, 2017, Highway Safety Programs; Conforming Products List of Screening Devices To Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids, 77 FR 35745, June 14, 2012, Highway Safety Programs; Conforming Products List of Calibrating Units for Breath Alcohol Testers, 77 FR 64588, October 22, 2012, Tips for Parents, Guardians, and Kids Bicycle Safety, DOT HS 811 557, January 2013, Comparison of Differences In Insurance Costs For Passenger Cars, Station Wagons/Passenger Vans, Pickups, and Utility Vehicles on the Basis of Damage Susceptibility; Calendar Years 2015 2017, September 2018, DDACTS Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety: Operational Guidelines, DOT HS 811 185, March 2014, Frequently Asked Questions About DDACTS, June 2015, Data Suggestions for Implementation Executive Summary, June 2015, U.S.DOT/NHTSA Guidelines for Reducing Visual-Manual Driver Distraction during Interactions with Integrated, In-Vehicle, Electronic Devices Version 1.01, September 2014, Visual-Manual Driver Distraction Guidelines Test Procedures Task Acceptance Testing Occlusion and Eye Glance Measurement Using Driving Simulator Testing, August 1, 2019, Explanatory Material About the Definition of a Task Used in NHTSA's Driver Distraction Guidelines, and Task Examples, DOT HS 811 858, November 2013, Understanding the Effects of Distracted Driving and Developing Strategies to Reduce Resulting Deaths and Injuries, A Report to Congress, DOT HS 812 053, December 2013, Investigation and Prosecution of Distracted Driving Cases, DOT HS 812 407, May 2017, Evaluation of NHTSA Distracted Driving Demonstration Projects in Connecticut and New York, DOT HS 811 635, March 2014, Four High-Visibility Enforcement Demonstration Waves in Connecticut and New York Reduce Hand-Held Phone Use, DOT HS 811 845, July 2011, High Visibility Enforcement Demonstration Programs in Connecticut and New York Reduce Hand-Held Phone Use, DOT HS 811 376, September 2010, National Phone Survey on Distracted Driving Attitudes and Behaviors, DOT HS 811 555, December 2011, Evaluation of the NHTSA Distracted Driving High-Visibility Enforcement Demonstration Projects in California and Delaware, DOT HS 812 108, January 2015, Process Overview of the High-Visibility Enforcement Programs Targeting Handheld Device Users in California and Delaware, DOT HS 812 109, January 2015, Field and Simulator Evaluations of a PC-Based Attention Maintenance Training Program, DOT HS 811 469, July 2011, Assessing the Feasibility of Vehicle-Based Sensors to Detect Drowsy Driving, DOT HS 811 886, February 2014, Sleep Disorders Fact Sheet for Medical Professionals, January 2013, Asleep at the Wheel A National Compendium of Efforts to Eliminate Drowsy Driving, DOT HS 812 352, March 2017, School Start Times and Teenage Driver Motor Vehicle Crashes, DOT HS 812 221, December 2015, National EMS Scope of Practice Model 2019, DOT HS 812 666, February 2019, EMS Agenda 2050: A People-Centered Vision for the Future of Emergency Medical Services, EMS Education Agenda for the Future: A Systems Approach, EMS Workforce Agenda for the Future, DOT HS 811 473, May 2011, Star of Life Background, Specifications, and Criteria, DOT HS 808 721, June 1995, Rapid Process for Emergent Changes to the National EMS Scope of Practice Model, September 1, 2018, National EMS Scope of Practice Model, DOT HS 810 657, February 2007, National EMS Core Content, DOT HS 809 898, July 2005, 1996 EMD Program Implementation and Administration: NSC, Beyond EMS Data Collection: Envisioning an Information-Driven Future for Emergency Medical Services, DOT HS 812 361, December 2016, A Leadership Guide to Quality Improvement for Emergency Medical Service Systems, Guide for Interfacility Patient Transfer, DOT HS 810 599, April 2006, Trauma System Agenda for the Future, DOT HS 809 675, March 2004, Report to Congress: Emergency Communications Centers and the Role of Communications Technologies in Reducing Mortality Rates in the Rural U.S., January 15, 2016, Guidelines for the Use and Availability of Helicopter Emergency Medical Transport (HEMS), April 2015, National Implementation of the Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Incident Triage, DOT HS 811 891, March 2014, Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Incident Triage: Addendum to the Advanced Emergency Medical Technician Instructional Guidelines, DOT HS 812 457a, December 2017, Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Incident Triage: Addendum to the Emergency Medical Responder Instructional Guidelines, DOT HS 812 457b, December 2017, Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Incident Triage: Addendum to the Paramedic Instructional Guidelines, DOT HS 812 457d, December 2017, Emergency Medical Technician Instructional Guidelines, DOT HS 811 077D, January 2009, National Emergency Medical Services Educational Standards, Paramedic Instructional Guidelines, DOT HS 811 077E, January 2009, Preparing for Pandemic Influenza: Recommendations for Protocol Development for 9-1-1 Personnel and Public Safety Answering Points, DOT HS 810 776, May 2007, EMS Pandemic Influenza Guidelines for Statewide Adoption, DOT HS 810 776, May 2007, National EMS Research Agenda, December 31, 2001, National EMS Assessment, 2011, DOT HS 811 723, December 2012, EMS Performance Measures: Recommended Attributes and Indicators, DOT HS 811 211, December 2009, Working Group Best-Practice Recommendations for the Safe Transportation of Children in Emergency Ground Ambulances, DOT HS 811 677, September 2012, NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2015-01: Recommended Best Practices for Protective Orders and Settlement Agreements in Civil Litigation, March 2016, NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2016-01: Guidance on Submission and Treatment of Manufacturer Communications to Dealers, Owners, or Purchasers About a Defect or Noncompliance, March 2016, NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2016-02: Safety-Related Defects and Automated Safety Technologies, September 2016, The Art of Appropriate Evaluation, A Guide for Highway Safety Program Managers, DOT HS 811 061, December 2008, Countermeasures That Work: A Highway Safety Countermeasure Guide For State Highway Safety Offices, 9, Sports Marketing Guidance, December 15, 2011, Buy America Act Guidance, November 16, 2015, Use of NHTSA Highway Safety Grant Funds for Certain Purchases, May 18, 2016, Funding Motorcycle Helmet Surveys, June 26, 2018, NHTSA HSP Amendment Process Upload Options, August 15, 2018, NHTSA HSP Amendment Review Implementation, August 15, 2018, Final External 405c Program Clarification, January 29, 2019, Non-Federal Share (Match) Guidance, August 13, 2019, FAST Act Maintenance of Effort Guidance, August 13, 2019, Paying for Law Enforcement and Prosecutor Activities Guidance, August 12, 2019, Notice of Buy America Waiver, June 30, 2015, Supercircular Webinar Follow-Up, August 20, 2015, Guidelines for States using NHTSA Grant Funds for DADSS Projects, June 4, 2019, General Questions Regarding MAP-21, July 26, 2013, Buy America Act Questions and Answers, March 2014, Update Observational Seat Belt Survey Site Selection, December 15, 2015, FY18 State Grant Application Overview Part I, February 23, 2017, FY18 State Grant Application Overview Part II, April 27, 2017, FY19 State Grant Application Overview, February 28, 2018, Fraud Detection and Prevention, January 22, 2020, Performance Management Webinar, February 19, 2020, Ignition Interlocks A Toolkit for Program Administrators, Policymakers, and Stakeholders, 2, DWI History of Fatally Injured Pedestrians, DOT HS 812 748, June 2019, An Evaluation of Intensive Supervision Programs for Serious DWI Offenders, DOT HS 811 446, March 2011, Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor Manual, 2, Understanding and Messaging to At Risk Drivers, June 2007, Determining the Effectiveness of Flexible Checkpoints, DOT HS 812 421, May 2017, Examination of the Feasibility of Alcohol Interlocks for Motorcycles, DOT HS 812 423, June 2017, Changes to Puerto Rico Motorcycle Rider Law, DOT HS 812 397, April 2017, New Mexico's Comprehensive Impaired-Driving Program: Crash Data Analysis, DOT HS 811 985, March 2014, Evaluation of State Ignition Interlock Programs: Interlock Use Analyses From 28 States, 2006-2011, DOT HS 812 145, May 2015, An Evaluation of the Three Georgia DUI Courts, February 2011, Determine Reasons For Repeat Drinking and Driving, DOT HS 808 401, May 1996, Evaluation of the Washington State Target Zero Teams Project, DOT HS 812 097, January 2015, Drug and Alcohol Crash Risk: A Case-Control Study, DOT HS 812 355, December 2016, Understanding the Limitations of Drug Test Information, Reporting, and Testing Practices in Fatal Crashes, DOT HS 812 072, November 2014, State Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Testing and Reporting for Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes: Current Practices, Results, and Strategies, 1997-2009, DOT HS 811 661, August 2012, Drugged Driving Expert Panel Report: A Consensus Protocol for Assessing the Potential of Drugs to Impair Driving, DOT HS 811 438, March 2011, Marijuana-Impaired Driving, A Report to Congress, DOT HS 812 440, July 2017, Drug-Impaired Driving: Understanding the Problem and Ways to Reduce It, DOT HS 811 268, December 2009, Law Enforcement Phlebotomy Toolkit: A Guide to Assist Law Enforcement Agencies With Planning and Implementing a Phlebotomy Program, March 28, 2019, Best Practices for Implementing a State Judicial Outreach Liaison Program, March 25, 2019, Impaired-Driving Leadership Model Findings Based on Three State Case Studies, DOT HS 812 516, October 2018, Marijuana, Other Drugs, and Alcohol Use by Drivers in Washington State, DOT HS 812 299, July 2016, Multiple Medications and Vehicle Crashes: Analysis of Databases, DOT HS 810 858, May 2008, Creating Impaired Driving General Deterrence: Eight Case Studies of Sustained, High-Visibility, Impaired-Driving Enforcement, DOT HS 809 950, March 2006, The Criminal Justice System: A Guide for Law Enforcement Officers and Expert Witnesses in Impaired Driving Cases, DOT HS 810 707, February 2007, Cross-Examination for Prosecutors, DOT HS 811 671, November 2012, DWI Prosecutor's Handbook, DOT HS 810 864, December 2007, Prosecutors Working with Victim Advocate Groups, DOT HS 811 244, June 2010, Implementing a Citizen's DWI Reporting Program Using the Extra Eyes Model, DOT HS 811 038, September 2008, Strategies for Addressing the DWI Offender, 10 Promising Sentencing Practices, DOT HS 809 850, March 2005, Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus: The Science and the Law, A Resource Guide for Judges, Prosecutors and Law Enforcement, September 1999, A Guide for Local Impaired-Driving Task Forces, Volume I: Final Report, DOT HS 811 460a, October 2011, A Guide for Local Impaired-Driving Task Forces, Volume II: Local Task Force Case Studies, DOT HS 811 460b, October 2011, Increasing Impaired-Driving Enforcement Visibility: Six Case Studies, DOT HS 811 716, February 2013, DWI Recidivism in the United States: An Examination of State-Level Driver Data and the Effect of Look-Back Periods on Recidivism Prevalence, DOT HS 811 991, March 2014, The Visual Detection of DWI Motorists, DOT HS 808 677, March 2010, New Mexico's Comprehensive Impaired-Driving Program: A Case Study, DOT HS 811 986, March 2014, Evaluation of the Checkpoint Strikeforce Program, DOT HS 811 056, November 2008, Alcohol and Highway Safety: Screening and Brief Intervention for Alcohol Problems as a Community Approach to Improving Traffic Safety, DOT HS 811 836, September 2013, Seat Belt, DWI, and Other Traffic Violations Among Recent Immigrants in Florida and Tennessee, DOT HS 811 761, May 2013, More Cops More Stops: Evaluation of a Combined Enforcement Program in Oklahoma and Tennessee, DOT HS 812 337, October 2016, Public Awareness Survey Recommendations of the NHTSA-GHSA Working Group, DOT HS 811 511, July 2011, Community-Based Impaired-Driving Programs: Local Ordinances and Other Strategies Addressing Impaired Driving, DOT HS 811 678, September 2012, Priorities for Reducing Alcohol-Related Driving Among Latino Communities, DOT HS 811 263, April 2010, Case Studies of Community-Based Self-Sufficient DWI Programs, DOT HS 811 300, July 2011, Evaluation of the New Mexico Ignition Interlock Program, DOT HS 811 410, November 2010, Source Investigations: A Tool to Combat Impaired Driving, DOT HS 811 519, November 2011, A Campaign to Reduce Impaired Driving Through Retail-Oriented Enforcement in Washington State, DOT HS 810 913, April 2008, Case Studies of Ignition Interlock Programs, DOT HS 811 594, April 2012, Model Guidelines for State Ignition Interlock Programs, DOT HS 811 859, November 2013, Driving While Impaired Arrest Process Improvement, DOT HS 812 308, August 2016, Key Features for Ignition Interlock Programs, DOT HS 811 262, March 2010, The ABCs of BAC: A Guide to Understanding Blood Alcohol Concentration and Alcohol Impairment, DOT HS 809 844, July 2016, Interpretation Regarding Preemption and Pre-Sale State Enforcement Safety Standards, January 7, 1982, Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment (Signal Lighting Statement of Policy), November 4, 1998, Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment (ID Lamp Location), April 5, 1999, Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment (Replacement Equipment), November 1, 2005, Motorcyclists Attitudes on Using High-Visibility Gear to Improve Conspicuity: Findings From a Focus Group Study, How to Identify Unsafe Motorcycle Helmets, DOT HS 807 880, September 2019, Motorcycle Safety, DOT HS 807 709, December 2007, Prioritized Recommendations of the National Agenda for Motorcycle Safety: Final Report, DOT HS 811 789, June 2013, The Importance of Sharing Data, DOT HS 810 687, March 2007, Model Performance Measures for State Traffic Records Systems, DOT HS 811 441, February 2011, State Traffic Information Systems Improvements: Promising Practices, DOT HS 811 502, July 2011, National Driver Register Frequently Asked Questions, November 2015, MMUCC Guideline, Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria, DOT HS 812 433, July 2017, Crash Data Improvement Program Guide, DOT HS 812 419, December 2017, Traffic Records Program Assessment Advisory, 2018 Edition, DOT HS 812 601, August 2018, Crash Report Sampling System: Design Overview, Analytic Guidance, and FAQs, DOT HS 812 688, April 2019, Data Integration: Linking it all Together, DOT HS 812 784, July 2019, State Traffic Records Coordinating Committee Strategic Planning Guide, DOT HS 812 773a, July 2019, Crash Investigation Sampling System: Design Overview, Analytic Guidance & FAQs, DOT HS 812 801, September 2019, Final Decision Notice, Consumer Information, New Car Assessment Program, July 11, 2008, Notice of Postponement of the Implementation of Enhancements to the New Car Assessment Program, December 24, 2008, Submission of Questions and Comments Given to NHTSA Regarding NCAP Enhancements, February 2009, New Car Assessment Program (Inclusion of Automatic Emergency Braking), November 5, 2015, New Car Assessment Program: Corrections (Policy on Rounding), May 16, 2014, Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier Test, October 2015, Side Impact Rigid Pole Test, October 2015, Dynamic Rollover Fishhook Maneuver, March 2013, Forward Collision Warning System, February 2013, Lane Departure Warning System, February 2013, Crash Imminent Brake System, October 2015, Out of Position Side Air Bag, November 2019, Procedures for Manufacturers to Request an Optional Test, Additional Procedures for Manufacturers to Request an Optional Test, Government 5-Star Safety Ratings for Motor Vehicles Advertising & Communication Usage Guidelines, November 20, 2013, Child Restraint Ease of Use Rating Criteria, February 1, 2008, Ease-of-Use Ratings Program, Conditions of Use, April 2, 2018, Information about Odometer Fraud, DOT HS 811 284, February 2010, Older Driver Compliance with License Restrictions, DOT HS 812 486, April 2018, Process and Outcomes Evaluation of Older Driver Screening Programs: The Assessment of Driving-Related Skills (ADReS) Older-Driver Screening Tool, DOT HS 811 113, May 2009, BAC and Crash Responsibility of Injured Older Drivers: An Analysis of Trauma Center Data, DOT HS 812 062, September 2014, Driver Fitness Medical Guidelines, DOT HS 811 210, September 2009, Medical Review Process and License Disposition of Drivers Referred by Law Enforcement and Other Sources in Virginia, DOT HS 811 484, July 2011, Licensing Procedures for Older Drivers, DOT HS 811 833, September 2013, Drive Well: Promoting Older Driver Safety and Mobility in Your Community, DOT HS 809 838, January 2007, Clinician's Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers, 3, Functional Assessments, Safety Outcomes, and Driving Exposure Measures for Older Drivers, DOT HS 811 630, August 2012, Evaluating Older Drivers' Skills, DOT HS 811 773, May 2013, Talking About Driving with an Older Driver, Taxonomy of Older Driver Behaviors and Crash Risk, DOT HS 811 468A, February 2012, Advancing Pedestrian Safety Using Education and Enforcement in Pedestrian Focus Cities and States: Chicago, DOT HS 812 082, October 2014, Advancing Pedestrian Safety Using Education and Enforcement in Pedestrian Focus Cities and States: North Carolina, DOT HS 812 286, June 2016, Pedestrian Safety Enforcement Operations: A How-To Guide, DOT HS 812 059, November 2014, Identifying Countermeasure Strategies to Increase Safety of Older Pedestrians, DOT HS 811 798, July 2013, Selecting School Bus Stop Locations: A Guide for School Transportation Professionals, July 2010, Additional Analysis of the National Child Restraint Use Special Study, DOT HS 812 462, October 2017, Additional Analysis of National Child Restraint Use Special Study: Characteristics of Those Not Restrained, DOT HS 812 477, October 2018, Feasibility of Modeling the Relationship Between Seat Belt Program Inputs and Outcomes, DOT HS 812 524, April 2018, Evaluation of Teen Seat Belt Demonstration Projects in Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas, DOT HS 812 464, July 2018, Evaluation of Nighttime Seat Belt Enforcement Demonstration Program and Identification of Characteristics of Unbelted High-Risk Drivers, DOT HS 812 474, April 2018, School Bus Seat Belts and Carryover Effects in Elementary School Children, DOT HS 811 187, October 2009, Click It or Ticket Evaluation 2008-2009, DOT HS 811 536, June 2013, Occupant Protection Issues Among Older Drivers and Passengers: Volume 1 Final Report, DOT HS 810 938, April 2008, Avoiding "Tween" Tragedies: Demonstration Project to Increase Seat Belt Use Among 8-to-15-Year-Old Motor Vehicle Occupants, DOT HS 811 096, June 2012, Primary Enforcement Saves Lives, The Case for Strong Safety Belt Laws, DOT HS 810 649, September 2006, Identifying Opportunities to Decrease Vehicle Occupant Fatalities, DOT HS 812 435, July 2017, The Click It or Ticket Evaluation, 2013, DOT HS 812 238, January 2016, Demonstration of the Trauma Nurses Talk Tough Seat Belt Diversion Program in North Carolina, DOT HS 811 873, March 2014, Evaluation of the Washington Nighttime Seat Belt Enforcement Program, DOT HS 812 395, April 2017, Documenting How States Recently Upgraded to Primary Seat Belt Laws, DOT HS 811 524, September 2011, Daytime and Nighttime Seat Belt Use by Fatally Injured Passenger Vehicle Occupants, DOT HS 811 281, July 2010, Impact of Implementing a Primary Enforcement Seat Belt Law in Florida: A Case Study, DOT HS 811 656, August 2012, Guidelines to Observe and Estimate Statewide Seat Belt Use at Night, DOT HS 811 288, March 2010, Speed-Measuring Device Specifications: Down-the-Road Radar Module, DOT HS 812 266, April 2016, Investigation of the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning Systems, DOT HS 811 996, May 2014, Automated Feedback to Foster Safe Driving in Young Drivers, Phase 2, DOT HS 812 230, December 2015, System Analysis of Automated Speed Enforcement Implementation, DOT HS 812 257, April 2016, Feasibility of Collecting Traffic Safety Data From Law Enforcement Agencies, DOT HS 811 447, April 2011, Motivations for Speeding, Volume I: Summary Report, DOT HS 811 658, August 2012, Motivations for Speeding, Volume II: Findings Report, DOT HS 811 818, September 2013, Motivations for Speeding, Volume III: Appendices, DOT HS 811 819, September 2013, Motivations for Speeding Additional Data Analysis, DOT HS 812 255, April 2016, Beginning Teenage Drivers, DOT HS 810 651, September 2006, Interim Administrative Guide for the Traffic Enforcement Technologies Program, November 2016, Conforming Product List for Speed-Measuring Devices, December 12, 2019, Peer-to-Peer Teen Traffic Safety Program Guide, DOT HS 812 631, March 2019, Evaluation of a Prototype Safer Teen Car: Final Report, DOT HS 811 784, June 2013, Distractions: In and Out of the Vehicle, July 26, 2017, Highway Safety Program Guideline No.
Funny Things I Used To Believe As A Kid,
Cleveland Skating Club Tennis,
San Marcos, Ca Rainfall Last 24 Hours,
Virginia Bar Attorney Search,
Articles D